Ain't No Shakespeare

(Source: bliss-injection, via plaincaseyjane)

(Source: namemefish, via herecomethedrums-945tl)

gossamerhandwriting:

hiddle-stoned:

life-more-abundantly:

denyselfandfollowchrist:

spadeoface:

he looks like one of the italian people pushing one of those boats

#DEAD

You don’t even understand, there are actual tears.

I fell off my chair.

(Source: iseeincolor91)

the-science-llama:

Reflection and Emission Nebulas
— Rho Ophiuchi Cloud Complex

Credit: Gerald Rhemann // Astrostudio

(via mentholhearts)

This is fake fyi. Google it tumblr.

(Source: billhitchert, via brauerpower)

the-science-llama:

If Earth Had Rings

First off, they would be really pretty to look at. They would also dominate the sky in both night and day at exactly the same place as they would never rise nor set. And at night you would see the Earth’s shadow swing across the rings, like in the 4th photo here.

However, life would be very different on Earth if this were the case. Nocturnal animals would have a hard time being nocturnal, as the light reflecting from the rings would illuminate the night.

Because we are closer to the Sun than Saturn is, the rings would be more rocky than ice, making them less bright but still pretty bright. In fact, you would see far less stars at night (living anywhere other than the equator or the arctic circle) because of the light pollution and not to mention ruin most meteor showers because of that.

During the day the rings would block sunlight in certain regions of the planet creating wild weather cycles and effecting plant life as well. So basically, they would be definitely pretty to look at but they would also make a whole lot of things screwy.

Illustrations by Ron Miller // io9
— Click the photos for captions

(via beaky-peartree)

Why I’m raising my son to be a nerd - CNN.com

(via crocbonker)

(via coeur-errant)

missmadhatter4life:

meltingpenguins:

qwertylady:

colourmeastonished:

fortheloveofemrys:

LOOK AT ALL THE EMOTIONS

I literally didnt recognize her

see i think the problem in twilight is not that kristen stewart is a bad actor

bella swan is just an awful character

^^ HERE HERE.

My friend and I have a conspiracy theory, which is that KS read the books, realised Bella has no emotions and is an utterly flat, unobtervant and dull character…and acted her perfectly canonically.

Also, yes, she looks so different here. It’s amazing.

I think that’s actually a fact. well, that and a good, healthy dose of ‘no one hates twilight as much as the cast’

You should see her performance in ‘Speak’. She manages to say a million things in a single glance in some of the scenes. She’s a very talented actress.

(via lumpyrug)

did-you-kno:

Source

tyleroakley:

Somebody created this. Somebody made this happen.

(Source: pleatedjeans, via whatsmyporpoise)

40yr-old-fangirl:

Oh Bruce.  You kill me, buddy.

(Source: bori-cha, via herecomethedrums-945tl)

the-w0lfe:

Doctor Who: A Brief Summary

(Source: retlawdisigny, via herecomethedrums-945tl)

(Source: aurielleomega, via herecomethedrums-945tl)

hammpix:

For those of you who don’t understand archaeology, I have made a diagram.

(via keemburleigh)